About a month after winning a second term, Donald Trump appeared on NBC News’ “Meet the “Press” and faced a question about an issue he rarely talks about: the federal minimum wage.
Host Kristen Welker reminded the president-elect that the federal minimum wage has been $7.25 for more than 15 years and asked whether he’s prepared to raise it. “It’s a very low number,” the Republican conceded, referring to the status quo. “I will agree, it’s a very low number.”
As the exchange continued, however, Trump, who’s spent years offering confusing and contradictory positions on the issue, declared that he (a) would “consider” an increase; and (b) he believes having a federal minimum wage doesn’t “work.”
Perhaps Scott Bessent, the president-elect’s choice for Treasury secretary, could offer some greater clarity on the matter? As NBC News noted, independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont pressed the prospective nominee on the issue during his confirmation hearing.
During an exchange with Sanders, Bessent said that the issue of the minimum wage is ‘more of a statewide and regional issue.’ Sanders then asked if the federal minimum wage should be increased from $7.25 and Bessent said it shouldn’t be. The last time the federal minimum wage increased was in 2009, after a 2007 measure phased in minimum wage increases over the next two years. According to the Department of Labor, that’s the longest stretch in U.S. history that the federal minimum wage has remained stagnant since the Federal Labor Standards Act established the minimum wage in 1938.
In other words, those hoping for an increase to the federal minimum wage apparently should expect to wait until 2029 — at the earliest.
But as notable as the exchange between Sanders and Bessent was, just as important was the would-be Cabinet secretary’s comments on tax policy. CNBC reported:
In an exchange with Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock of Georgia, Bessent repeatedly declined to say that he would be willing to raise taxes on America’s highest earners. He reiterated his support for extending the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act from Trump’s first term. ‘There’s no income level that I don’t think we should continue with the TCJA as it was,’ Bessent said.
The Washington Post published a much-discussed report the day after Christmas that highlighted the perspectives of several low-income voters who supported the Trump ticket in the 2024 elections. The article specifically referenced a middle-aged Pennsylvania woman who struggles to make ends meet despite receiving food stamps and Social Security benefits, who explained why she voted for the Republican ticket.
“[Trump] is more attuned to the needs of everyone instead of just the rich,” the woman told the Post. “I think he knows it’s the poor people that got him elected, so I think Trump is going to do more to help us.”
A month later, the president-elect is giving jobs to billionaires, offices to billionaires, perks to billionaires and his choice to lead the Treasury Department is prioritizing tax breaks that disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
The Republican team apparently also intends to keep ignoring calls for a minimum wage hike.
Those waiting for Trump and his incoming administration to champion those struggling the most will likely be waiting a long while.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com